150+
mock exams
17,986
tests completed
2,30,795
questions answered
The has issued an advisory to state governments, urging them to restructure their crop bonus policies to promote the cultivation of pulses, oilseeds, and millets. The move aims to discourage the common state practice of declaring bonuses above the official for wheat and paddy, which has historically driven unsustainable monoculture and high import dependence for edible oils.
The Minimum Support Price is a market intervention by the Centre, recommended by the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, to insure farmers against price drops. However, several states announce additional financial bonuses specifically for wheat and paddy. This market distortion heavily skews cropping patterns towards these cereals, disincentivizing the cultivation of pulses and oilseeds. Consequently, India faces a paradoxical situation: surplus production of cereals causing storage challenges, alongside heavy import dependence for edible oils and pulses. By advising states to redirect bonuses towards oilseeds and millets (Shree Anna), the Centre aims to reduce the import bill, protect against international supply-chain disruptions, and enhance national nutritional security.
The current bonus structure heavily promotes monoculture (growing a single crop repeatedly on the same land) of water-intensive crops like paddy and wheat, particularly in Northern India. This has led to severe environmental stress, including alarming groundwater depletion in states like Punjab and Haryana, and soil degradation due to excessive, fertilizer-intensive farming. Shifting policy support towards crop diversification is critical for ecological sustainability. Millets are climate-resilient and require significantly less water, while pulses are leguminous crops that naturally fix atmospheric nitrogen, reducing the need for synthetic urea. Aligning state incentives with these crops promotes sustainable agricultural practices and builds resilience against climate change.
Because agriculture is primarily listed under the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, the Union government cannot directly mandate state-level agricultural policies. Instead, the Centre relies on principles of cooperative federalism, using advisories—in this case from the Department of Expenditure—to gently steer state actions toward national priorities. State-declared bonuses over MSP have often been a point of friction, as they distort national procurement mechanisms and inflate fiscal deficits. The Centre's approach of framing this alignment as a "shared responsibility" rather than a directive highlights the delicate balance of fiscal federalism, where national food security goals must be achieved through state-level cooperation without infringing on state autonomy.