MHA proposes new Chapter K under Article 371 for Ladakh

Context
The (MHA) has proposed a new constitutional provision, Chapter K under , to create an elected body with specific legislative powers for the Union Territory (UT) of Ladakh. This proposal comes in response to sustained protests by civil society groups, including the (LAB) and (KDA), demanding Statehood, tribal status, and constitutional safeguards following the abrogation of in 2019, which transformed Ladakh into a UT without a legislature.
Exam perspectives
The proposed Chapter K under Article 371 represents a significant shift in India's asymmetric federalism (a system where different constituent units enjoy varying degrees of autonomy). Article 371 (A-J) currently provides 'Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions' for 12 states, often addressing specific regional, tribal, or historical concerns (e.g., Article 371A for Nagaland protects religious/social practices and customary law). For Ladakh, the MHA's proposal outlines a sui generis model (unique in its characteristics), offering a directly elected UT-level body with legislative powers over land, culture, language, forest, environment, and natural resources. This is distinct from the Sixth Schedule, which Ladakh leaders initially demanded (providing autonomous district councils for tribal areas), as it embeds safeguards directly into the Constitution via a new chapter. UPSC aspirants should analyze this as an alternative approach to granting autonomy without conferring full Statehood, reflecting a delicate balancing act by the Centre in managing regional aspirations in a strategically sensitive border region.
The transition of Ladakh from a region within the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir to a UT without a legislature fundamentally altered its governance structure, placing it under the direct administration of a Lieutenant Governor (L-G). This shift centralized power, leading to the current demands for decentralization and local representation. The civil society's insistence that the L-G refrain from major administrative decisions concerning land and bureaucracy until the new elected body is established highlights the tension between direct central rule and local democratic participation. The proposed body, having legislative powers akin to those under Article 240 (which empowers the President to make regulations for certain UTs), aims to restore a degree of representative governance. Aspirants should examine the challenges of administering UTs without legislatures, particularly in ensuring accountability and responsiveness to local populations, and how the proposed Chapter K seeks to address this democratic deficit.
The demands from the Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance are deeply rooted in concerns over identity, culture, and resource control. Following the loss of special status under Article 370, apprehensions grew regarding land alienation and demographic changes in a region where over 90% of the population belongs to Scheduled Tribes. The initial demand for inclusion in the Sixth Schedule (which applies to tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram) aimed to protect tribal rights over land and resources. The proposed Chapter K under Article 371 attempts to address these anxieties by offering specific legislative powers over culture, language, and land. This situation exemplifies the complexities of integrating diverse cultural and tribal identities within a unitary governance framework (UT status), and how constitutional engineering (like the proposed amendment) is utilized to accommodate these sub-national identities and protect the interests of indigenous populations.
Key references
AI-generated study notes, sourced from The Hindu. Verify facts and figures with standard sources.